Journal of Behavioral Addictions· 2026Q1
Using light to establish habits in laboratory mice
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Researchers validated a new operant paradigm where mice learn to lever-press for green light, demonstrating light can act as a reward to establish habits independent of physiological needs or novelty seeking.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Mice can be trained to lever-press for green light, establishing a learned behavior independent of physiological deprivation or novelty.
- Instrumental contingency (light delivery only after pressing) was crucial for acquiring the lever-pressing behavior.
- The effect of light as a reward was demonstrated by its ability to potentiate food seeking.
- Red light, producing less retinal excitation, failed to sustain the behavior, indicating a specific visual cue effect rather than thermal or alerting cues.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Background and aims: Perseverative behaviours are commonly assessed using operant paradigms in which rodents work for drugs or food under physiological deprivation, limiting translational relevance to some behavioural addictions. Here we validated an operant paradigm in which the acquired behaviour is driven neither by physiological needs nor novelty seeking. Methods: Mice were trained to lever-press for green light. Exp.1 used a within-subjects design to examine lever discrimination and whether responding could be "satiated" by light preexposure. Exp.2 examined the necessity of instrumental contingency using a between-subjects design, with light delivery equated between contingent and non-contingent groups. Exp.3 replaced green light with dim red light producing less retinal photoreceptor excitation but comparable heat to assess non-photic cues. Exp.4 examined whether green light could affect food seeking under different motivational states. Results: In Exp.1, green light supported lever discrimination. Among high responders, the satiation effect was modest (<15% reduction) and did not deter lever pressing. In Exp.2, instrumental contingency promoted response acquisition whereas random light delivery did not. In Exp.3, dim red light failed to sustain behaviour, producing ∼50% response decrement. In Exp.4, light potentiated food seeking under ad libitum feeding. Discussion and conclusions: Response-contingent light serves as a reward to establish operant responding, which cannot be explained by alerting effects or thermal cues. Our study bridges the gap between animal models and findings from humans that coloured light may exacerbate smartphone use and that light therapy may reshape reward circuits in individuals with Internet gaming disorder symptoms [Li et al. (2026) Advanced Science 13:e14044].
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
Cellular and Molecular NeuroscienceNeuroscience