International Journal of Stroke· 2014Q1· Review
Part I: Frequency of Depression after Stroke: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
- 1,126citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2014year
Short summary
A meta-analysis of 61 studies (25,488 patients) found the overall frequency of depression after stroke remains 31%, unchanged from a 2005 review, indicating a lack of clinical uptake of known prevention and treatment strategies.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The overall frequency of depression after stroke is estimated at 31% (95% CI 28% to 35%) across 61 observational studies.
- This frequency is not significantly different from a 2005 review, indicating no improvement over time.
- Depression rates were lower at later time points: 25% between one and five years, and 23% at five years post-stroke.
- Despite available screening tools and effective treatments, clinical uptake of these strategies remains low.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Approximately 15 million people who suffer a stroke globally each year are at risk of developing depression. AIM: To update our systematic review and meta-analysis of the frequency of depression after stroke published in 2005, including studies published before July 2004. METHODS: We included all published observational studies (to 31 May 2013) with prospective consecutive recruitment and quantification of the proportion of people with depression after stroke. We included studies of adult (>18 years) patients with a clinical diagnosis of stroke, where an assessment of depression or depressive symptom burden was performed at a pre-specified time-point for all study participants. RESULTS: Data were available from 61 studies including 25,488 people. The proportional frequency of depression varied considerably across studies; however, the pooled frequency estimate of 31% (95% confidence interval 28% to 35%) was not significantly different from the 33% (difference of 2%, 95% confidence interval <1% to 3%) reported in the 2005 review. The proportion with depression between one and five-years (25%; 95% confidence interval 16 to 33%) and at five years after stroke (23%; 95% confidence interval 14 to 31%) was significantly lower. CONCLUSION: Despite systematic review evidence describing validated depression screening tools and effective treatment and prevention strategies for depression after stroke, there has not been a significant reduction in the proportion of people experiencing depression after stroke. There is a pressing need for increased clinical uptake of evidenced-based strategies to screen for, prevent, and treat depression after stroke.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Stroke, 2014 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Rehabilitation
RehabilitationMedicine