Journal of International Arbitration· 2026Q2
Anti-enforcement Injunctions and the English Courts: From ‘Rare Beast’ to Common Beast?
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
English Courts are increasingly granting Anti-Enforcement Injunctions (AEIs) to prevent parties from enforcing foreign judgments that breach jurisdiction clauses, a shift marked by a reduced role for comity and pre-emptive relief.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- English Courts are increasingly issuing Anti-Enforcement Injunctions (AEIs).
- AEIs aim to prevent enforcement of foreign judgments that breach jurisdiction clauses.
- The role of comity in AEI decisions has been significantly reduced.
- English Courts are now willing to grant AEIs pre-emptively, before a foreign judgment is rendered.
- These shifts are linked to efforts to counter circumvention of arbitration and jurisdiction clauses, especially in Russian cases.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The sanctions by the UK and European Union (EU) against Russia have raised difficult questions about upholding exclusive jurisdiction and arbitration clauses. One way of trying to uphold jurisdiction clauses is by granting injunctive relief to restrain the enforcement of any resulting judgment in breach of the same. This article examines the recent approach of the English Courts to granting Anti-Enforcement Injunctions (AEIs) which seek to restrain a party from enforcing a judgment obtained in a foreign Court in breach of a jurisdiction clause. Two shifts have occurred: the role of comity has been substantially marginalized; and the English Courts have been willing to grant AEI relief on a pre-emptive basis before any foreign judgment is rendered. The article argues that whilst these developments reflect an appropriate response to the use of Russian legislation to circumvent arbitration agreements and exclusive jurisdiction clauses, the Russian cases should be understood as exceptional and may not represent a permanent recalibration by the English Courts.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of International Arbitration, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Strategy and Management
Strategy and ManagementBusiness, Management and Accounting