Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders· 2026Q1· Review
Evaluating the Effects of Skill-Based Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Studies
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A meta-analysis of 28 single-case studies (99 applications) found that skill-based treatment (SBT) significantly reduces challenging behaviors (M = 0.47 Baseline-Corrected Tau), with good social validity reported.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Skill-based treatment (SBT) combines functional communication training with contingency-based delay and denial tolerance.
- A meta-analysis of 99 SBT applications across 28 studies showed a good reduction in challenging behaviors (M = 0.47 Baseline-Corrected Tau).
- SBT has been applied to diverse diagnoses, behaviors, and abilities, primarily in controlled settings by skilled implementers.
- Studies reported good social validity for SBT, indicating its acceptability to users.
- The quality of the literature varied, with 37% rated as weak and 43% as borderline-adequate.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Purpose The skill-based treatment for challenging behaviour (SBT) is an intervention package that combines functional communication training with contingency-based delay and denial tolerance training. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to (a) investigate the application of SBT across diverse populations, setting, and target behaviours; and (b) to evaluate the effectiveness and social validity of SBT in reducing challenging behaviours. Methods This review was pre-registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024561455). Seven databases were searched. Data were extracted on characteristics of studies, participants, and applications of SBT. Literature was assessed for quality using the Evaluative Method and Single Case Design Risk of Bias Tool. SBT outcomes were quantified with Baseline-Corrected Tau (Tau-BC). Results A total of 28 studies were reviewed, representing 99 individual SBT applications. SBT has been applied across participants with varying diagnoses, challenging behaviours, and levels of ability, though mostly in controlled settings by skilled implementers. Studies provided evidence for the social validity of SBT. Baseline-Corrected Tau indicated SBT shows good reduction in challenging behaviour ( M = 0.47, range: − 0.35–1.00). The Evaluative Method indicated the literature to be of varying quality (borderline-strong = 7%; adequate = 13%; borderline-adequate = 43%; weak = 37%), and the evidence-based practice score suggests SBT to be a potentially evidence-based practice. Conclusion The evaluative method indicates SBT to be an emerging evidence-based practice for addressing challenging behaviour, although the majority of the literature scored lower than adequate. We make recommendations for strengthening the literature base and outline key implications for practitioners.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Developmental and Educational Psychology
Developmental and Educational PsychologyPsychology