Religion· 2026Q1
Platformised sacrality: rating, reviewing, and picturing Amsterdam’s mosques on Google Maps
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Amsterdam's mosques are increasingly experienced as 'platform objects' on Google Maps, where user reviews and images, rather than religious tradition, shape their findability and evaluation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Introduces 'platformised sacrality' to describe how digital platforms mediate religious sites.
- Analyzed 62 Amsterdam mosques using 7,656 Google Maps reviews and 1,908 user images (2012-2025).
- Platform design, not mosque activities, quadrupled evaluation through a single prompt change.
- User reviews remain devotional, visuals stable, but evaluation timing shifts with Ramadan.
- Users perform 'sacralising work' in unstructured review slots due to platform limitations.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Platform studies and digital religion scholarship rarely meet. Taking Amsterdam’s mosques as its case, this article analyses 62 mosques through 7,656 Google Maps reviews and 1,908 user-uploaded images (2012–2025) to show that platformisation reconfigures the conditions under which religious sites become findable, evaluable, and visible. ‘Platformised sacrality’ names this condition, in which places of worship are at once sites of devotion and platform objects, rated and photographed through an interface built without reference to religious traditions. Attention is radically concentrated; evaluation quadrupled in a single month through a change in platform prompting rather than anything at the mosques, even as its annual peak drifts with the lunar calendar of Ramadan. Review discourse remains predominantly devotional, the visual regime strikingly stable. Because the interface offers no field for marking a place as set apart, sacralising work migrates into its one unstructured slot, performed by users, not by platform or mosque.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Religion, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Philosophy
PhilosophyArts and Humanities