Acta Psychologica· 2026Q1
Drawing as an encoding strategy for memory: An fNIRS study
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Drawing words' referents improved memory recall by 11% and motivation compared to silent reading, engaging sensorimotor and superior parietal lobule brain regions.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Drawing referents improved item hit rate by 11% compared to silent reading.
- Drawing also increased participant motivation relative to silent reading.
- Drawing elicited stronger activation in sensorimotor cortices and the superior parietal lobule than silent reading.
- Finger drawing and stylus drawing yielded similar behavioral and neural outcomes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Drawing reliably improves memory relative to other encoding strategies (such as reading and writing), a phenomenon known as the drawing effect. Although behavioral studies have documented this advantage, the neural mechanisms supporting it remain unclear. The present study examined cortical activity during drawing-based encoding using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Young adults were recruited to memorize words either by drawing the referents or silently reading them, and neural activity was recorded during encoding. The study also compared finger drawing and stylus drawing to test whether different drawing modes produce distinct behavioral or neural outcomes. Behaviorally, drawing improved item hit rate and increased motivation relative to silent reading but did not enhance source memory. Neurophysiologically, drawing elicited stronger activation than silent reading in sensorimotor cortices and the superior parietal lobule, regions implicated in motor planning and execution, sensory feedback, and visuospatial integration. In contrast, finger drawing and stylus drawing showed largely comparable behavioral and neural patterns. These findings partially support the integrated-components model of the drawing effect at the neurophysiological level.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Acta Psychologica, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Education
EducationSocial Sciences