PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Transplantation· 2019Q1

Recommended Treatment for Antibody-mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: The 2019 Expert Consensus From the Transplantion Society Working Group

Carrie A. Schinstock, Roslyn B. Mannon, Klemens Budde, Anita S. Chong et al.

Short summary

A 2019 expert consensus from The Transplantation Society recommends treatment for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplant recipients, largely based on expert opinion due to a lack of high-level evidence.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • AMR is a major cause of kidney graft loss, with increasing diagnoses.
  • No approved therapies exist for AMR, and treatment guidelines lack strong evidence.
  • A 2019 expert consensus provides recommendations for active and chronic active AMR treatment.
  • Recommendations are largely based on expert opinion due to limited clinical trial data.
  • There is an urgent need for prospective, powered clinical trials to establish evidence-based therapies.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

With the development of modern solid-phase assays to detect anti-HLA antibodies and a more precise histological classification, the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has become more common and is a major cause of kidney graft loss. Currently, there are no approved therapies and treatment guidelines are based on low-level evidence. The number of prospective randomized trials for the treatment of AMR is small, and the lack of an accepted common standard for care has been an impediment to the development of new therapies. To help alleviate this, The Transplantation Society convened a meeting of international experts to develop a consensus as to what is appropriate treatment for active and chronic active AMR. The aim was to reach a consensus for standard of care treatment against which new therapies could be evaluated. At the meeting, the underlying biology of AMR, the criteria for diagnosis, the clinical phenotypes, and outcomes were discussed. The evidence for different treatments was reviewed, and a consensus for what is acceptable standard of care for the treatment of active and chronic active AMR was presented. While it was agreed that the aims of treatment are to preserve renal function, reduce histological injury, and reduce the titer of donor-specific antibody, there was no conclusive evidence to support any specific therapy. As a result, the treatment recommendations are largely based on expert opinion. It is acknowledged that properly conducted and powered clinical trials of biologically plausible agents are urgently needed to improve patient outcomes.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Transplantation, 2019 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Transplantation

TransplantationMedicine