Journal of the American Society of Nephrology· 2017Q1
A Randomized Trial of Bortezomib in Late Antibody-Mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection
- 298citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2017year
Short summary
A randomized trial (BORTEJECT) found that bortezomib did not significantly prevent GFR decline in kidney transplant recipients with late antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), showing no improvement in GFR, graft survival, or rejection markers over 24 months compared to placebo, and was associated with increased toxicity.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Bortezomib did not significantly alter the eGFR slope compared to placebo in DSA-positive kidney transplant recipients with late ABMR.
- No significant differences were observed in median measured GFR at 24 months between bortezomib (33 ml/min) and placebo (42 ml/min) groups.
- Graft survival at 2 years was 81% with bortezomib versus 96% with placebo, a difference that did not reach statistical significance.
- Bortezomib treatment was associated with increased gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Export Late antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a leading cause of kidney allograft failure. Uncontrolled studies have suggested efficacy of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, but no systematic trial has been undertaken to support its use in ABMR. In this randomized, placebo-controlled trial (the Bortezomib in Late Antibody-Mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection [BORTEJECT] Trial), we investigated whether two cycles of bortezomib (each cycle: 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11) prevent GFR decline by halting the progression of late donor-specific antibody (DSA)–positive ABMR. Forty-four DSA-positive kidney transplant recipients with characteristic ABMR morphology (median time after transplant, 5.0 years; pretransplant DSA documented in 19 recipients), who were identified on cross-sectional screening of 741 patients, were randomly assigned to receive bortezomib (n=21) or placebo (n=23). The 0.5-ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year (95% confidence interval, −4.8 to 5.8) difference detected between bortezomib and placebo in eGFR slope (primary end point) was not significant (P=0.86). We detected no significant differences between bortezomib- and placebo-treated groups in median measured GFR at 24 months (33 versus 42 ml/min per 1.73 m2; P=0.31), 2-year graft survival (81% versus 96%; P=0.12), urinary protein concentration, DSA levels, or morphologic or molecular rejection phenotypes in 24-month follow-up biopsy specimens. Bortezomib, however, associated with gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity. In conclusion, our trial failed to show that bortezomib prevents GFR loss, improves histologic or molecular disease features, or reduces DSA, despite significant toxicity. Our results reinforce the need for systematic trials to dissect the efficiency and safety of new treatments for late ABMR.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2017 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Transplantation
TransplantationMedicine