PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Foods· 2026Q1· Review

Bioactive Compounds in Fruit Wines: A Narrative Review

Uroš Čakar, Tijana Ilić, José Yamil Neira Hinojosa, Carlos L. Céspedes et al.

Short summary

Fruit wines from non-grape sources exhibit diverse bioactive compound profiles, with berry wines typically highest in phenolics and anthocyanins, while other fruit wines show distinct patterns of phenolic acids and flavonoids.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Fruit wines from non-grape sources are value-added beverages with diverse bioactive compounds.
  • Berry wines are rich in phenolics and anthocyanins; other fruit wines have distinct phenolic acid and flavonoid profiles.
  • Raw material choice and production technology significantly impact fruit wine composition and functional properties.
  • Fruit-wine pomace offers potential for valorization due to residual bioactive compounds.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Fruit wines produced from non-grape fruits are gaining increasing attention as value-added fermented beverages due to their diverse chemical composition and content of bioactive compounds. This narrative review provides a comparative overview of fruit wines obtained from berries, drupes, pome fruits, citrus fruits, and tropical fruits, with particular emphasis on their physicochemical characteristics, phenolic composition, antioxidant properties, and technological aspects of production. Rather than considering fruit wines as a single category, the available evidence is examined across different fruit groups to identify characteristic patterns in the occurrence and relative abundance of bioactive compounds and their associated antioxidant activity. Berry wines are generally distinguished by their high phenolic and anthocyanin contents, whereas wines produced from other fruit categories exhibit distinct profiles of phenolic acids, flavonoids, and other bioactive constituents. Differences in raw materials and technological conditions, including fermentation and processing strategies, contribute substantially to the variability observed in the composition and functional properties of the resulting wines. The review also considers fruit-wine pomace as a potentially valuable source of residual bioactive compounds, highlighting opportunities for its valorization within sustainable and circular production systems. However, differences in analytical methods, reporting units, sample matrices, and experimental conditions currently limit direct quantitative comparisons among studies. Overall, this review integrates compositional, technological, and antioxidant-activity data across major fruit categories, identifies current knowledge gaps, and highlights opportunities for improving fruit-wine production, analytical characterization, and the sustainable utilization of fruit-processing by-products.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Foods, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Food Science

Food ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences