Religions· 2026Q1
The Immortality of the Soul According to Thomas Aquinas
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Thomas Aquinas argues the human soul is immortal because its operation (intellection) is immaterial, requiring an immaterial existence grounded in divine creation, and as a subsistent immaterial form, it remains incorruptible even after the body's death.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Aquinas deduces the soul's immateriality from its capacity for universal intellection.
- An immaterial operation implies a corresponding immaterial existence (esse) grounded in divine creation.
- As a subsistent immaterial form, the soul is incorruptible per se, even when separated from the body.
- Aquinas's argument avoids Platonic dualism and complements Christian resurrection doctrine.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This article systematically examines the question of the human soul’s immortality—or incorruptibility—in the writings of Thomas Aquinas. The study traces Aquinas’s three-stage argumentation across his academic career, distinguishing his approach from those of Plato, Aristotle, and later thinkers. The first stage highlights the immateriality of human intellection, deduced empirically from the soul’s capacity to know all corporeal forms and to abstract universals. Moving to the metaphysical plane, as a second stage, the analysis underscores the principle that a proper immaterial operation necessitates a corresponding immaterial esse (act of being); this distinct existence, Aquinas contends, is grounded in divine creation rather than natural pre-existence or an emanation from a universal soul. Finally, the paper details how Aquinas resolves the tension of the human psycho-somatic unity. The article clarifies that as a subsistent immaterial form, the soul is incorruptible per se, even upon the body’s demise. Furthermore, the article briefly assesses various historical and practical objections regarding the separated soul’s impoverished activity and individuation without matter. Ultimately, the text maintains that Aquinas’s nuanced philosophical defense takes the reality of death seriously and deliberately avoids Platonic dualism. This approach, it posits, serves as a reasoned “preamble to hope” that rationally complements the Christian doctrine of bodily resurrection rather than substituting it.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Religions, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Philosophy
PhilosophyArts and Humanities