International Journal of Production Research· 2025Q1
Agentic LLMs in the supply chain: towards autonomous multi-agent consensus-seeking
- 38citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2025year
Short summary
LLM agents, when equipped with specific tools and negotiation frameworks, can autonomously seek consensus in supply chains, significantly reducing bullwhip effects better than traditional restocking policies and centralized demand approaches.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- LLM agents can automate consensus-seeking in supply chains, overcoming previous computational challenges.
- Novel, supply chain-specific consensus-seeking frameworks were developed and tested.
- LLM agents minimized bullwhip effects better than restocking policies and centralized demand approaches in a case study.
- Agent behavior within a negotiation framework converged to best practices for reducing the bullwhip effect.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Supply Chain Management relies on human consensus in decision-making to avoid emergent problems like the bullwhip effect. Some routine consensus processes, especially those that are time-intensive, can be automated. Previously proposed supply chain automation solutions for consensus-seeking and coordination faced computational challenges, resulting in high entry barriers. Recent advances in Generative AI, particularly Large Language Model agents (LLM agents), could overcome these barriers. This paper explores how LLM agents can automate consensus-seeking in supply chains. We introduce a series of novel, supply chain-specific consensus-seeking frameworks and validate the effectiveness of our approach through a case study in inventory management, where agents that represent companies in a supply chain are able to balance selfish goals with systemic outcomes through conversation. Our results show that introducing LLM-based consensus-seeking frameworks reduces bullwhip effects. When equipped with appropriate tools, LLM agents can minimise bullwhip better than restocking policies and centralised demand approaches. Additionally, when LLM agents are handled within a negotiation framework, their behaviour converges to best practices in the supply chain literature on how to lessen the bullwhip effect. To provide a foundation for further advancements in LLM-based autonomous supply chain solutions, we open-source our code.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Production Research, 2025 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Management Information SystemsBusiness, Management and Accounting