PofoliaShared via Pofolia

PLoS ONE· 2026Q1

Cross-national and historical variation in relative age effects in professional football

Thomas Grund

Short summary

Relative age effects (RAE) in professional football have widened over time, with players born in 2005–2009 showing birth-quarter imbalances 9 percentage points greater than those born in 1985–1989.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Relative age effects (RAE) in professional football vary significantly across 44 national systems, from near zero to over 40 percentage points.
  • RAE has increased over time, with birth-quarter imbalances widening by approximately 9 percentage points between the 1985–1989 and 2005–2009 birth cohorts.
  • National footballing strength, GDP per capita, and population show weak and inconsistent associations with cross-national RAE differences.
  • Macro-level indicators do not explain the historical increase in RAE when country and cohort are controlled.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The relative age effect (RAE) — the overrepresentation of players born early in the selection year — is one of the most robust findings in sports science, yet how much it varies across countries and over time remains surprisingly underexplored. Drawing on birth-date data for 49,578 male professional footballers across 44 national systems and five birth cohorts (1985–2009), this study describes three patterns that have not previously been examined together. RAE magnitude varies enormously across national football systems, ranging from close to zero to birth-quarter gaps exceeding 40 percentage points. It has also increased across successive birth cohorts: players born in 2005–2009 show birth-quarter imbalances roughly 9 percentage points wider than those born in 1985–1989. Common macro-level indicators — national footballing strength, gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, and population — show at most weak and inconsistent associations with cross-national differences in RAE and do not account for the historical increase once country and cohort are held fixed. Together, these findings provide a comparative benchmark for understanding cross-national and historical variation in relative age effects.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. PLoS ONE, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Developmental and Educational Psychology

Developmental and Educational PsychologyPsychology