Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools· 2026Q1· Review
Assessment of Personal Narrative Skills in Children Aged 4–18 Years: A Systematic Review
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A systematic review of 211 studies (37,477 participants aged 4-18) found substantial heterogeneity in how children's personal narrative skills are assessed, with 907 distinct analysis measures identified, spanning all four components of the LUNA framework.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- 211 studies involving 37,477 participants aged 4-18 were systematically reviewed.
- A total of 907 analysis measures were identified, with 763 focusing on language.
- Assessment methods commonly used question prompts, brief examples, and modeled narratives.
- Analyzed discourse aspects covered all four LUNA framework components: pragmatics, macrostructure, propositional, and linguistic.
- An open-access dataset is available to support future research.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Assessment of children's personal narratives offers important insights into their functional language abilities. This systematic review identifies current assessment and analysis practices for evaluating the personal event narratives of school-age children and provides a comprehensive overview to guide future research and clinical application. METHOD: The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022345679) and followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Electronic databases (CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global) were searched in August 2022 and September 2024 for peer-reviewed studies and dissertations or theses published in English that evaluated personal narrative skills in participants aged 4-18 years. There was no date limit. Extracted data included study design, participant samples, assessment tasks, and analysis measures. Analysis measures were categorized using the Linguistic Underpinnings of Narrative in Aphasia (LUNA) framework. RESULTS: A total of 211 studies (37,477 participants) were included. Recent years have seen an increasing number of studies related to personal narratives. Elicitation methods commonly involved question prompts, brief examples, and modeled personal narratives. Across studies, 907 analysis measures were identified (763 language measures), reflecting substantial heterogeneity. Discourse aspects analyzed spanned all four LUNA framework components: pragmatics, macrostructure planning, propositional, and linguistic. CONCLUSIONS: This review article catalogs the range of assessment methods and analysis procedures that can be used to evaluate children's personal narratives. Mapping the language measures onto the LUNA framework highlighted which discourse elements have received research attention. These findings may assist clinicians in interpreting available data and selecting assessment and intervention targets. The accompanying open-access data set, available via the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository, provides a foundation for future research, including investigations of population-specific needs and methodological trends.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Developmental and Educational Psychology
Developmental and Educational PsychologyPsychology