PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools· 2026Q1

Heritage Speakers Telling Fictional Stories in Two Languages: Cross-Linguistic Differences in Macrostructure

Sveta Fichman, Carmit Altman, Joel Walters, Sharon Armon-Lotem

Short summary

Five- to six-year-old heritage language (HL) speakers showed significant cross-linguistic differences in narrative macrostructure when retelling stories in English-Hebrew, but not Russian-Hebrew or French-Hebrew.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Significant cross-linguistic differences in narrative macrostructure were observed in 5- to 6-year-old English-Hebrew bilinguals, but not in Russian-Hebrew or French-Hebrew bilinguals.
  • English-Hebrew and Russian-Hebrew bilinguals produced narratives with more goal-attempt and goal-outcome sequences compared to Hebrew-only narratives.
  • Individual story grammar elements were more prevalent in heritage language narratives than in the societal language, especially for the English-Hebrew group.
  • Narrative macrostructure differences appear to be unique to specific heritage language-societal language pairings, rather than universal.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

PURPOSE: The article aimed to examine cross-linguistic differences in macrostructure abilities in the narratives of 5- to 6-year-old preschool children from diverse heritage language (HL) backgrounds who speak Hebrew as the societal language (SL). METHOD: = 20). Narratives were collected via retelling in both languages with support from six colored pictures following the procedures and coding of the Language Impairment Testing in Multilingual Settings-Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives (LITMUS-MAIN). Story scripts in each language reflect story grammar (SG) elements, including setting (time, place, and main characters) and three episodes per story, where each episode contains goal, attempt, and outcome. Stories retold in both languages were transcribed and coded for macrostructure features, following the LITMUS-MAIN coding procedure. The coding included story structure (sum of all elements, maximum score = 17), structural complexity (number of goal-attempt or goal-outcome sequences and number of goal-attempt-outcome sequences), and individual SG elements. All three components of macrostructure were analyzed for cross-linguistic and cross-group differences. RESULTS: Analyses revealed significant cross-linguistic differences in most components for the English-Hebrew group, but not for the Russian-Hebrew or French-Hebrew groups. More subtle differences were revealed by structural complexity analysis, such that narratives of HL English-Hebrew and Russian-Hebrew bilinguals included more goal-attempt and goal-outcome combinations. The presence of individual SG elements was also higher in HL than in SL, and this trend was more evident in the English-Hebrew group. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-linguistic differences in macrostructure might not be universal; rather, each HL group has unique profiles of storytelling. We discuss ethnolinguistic identity and cultural values as possible factors contributing to these differences. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.33325110.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Developmental and Educational Psychology

Developmental and Educational PsychologyPsychology