American Journal of Industrial Medicine· 2026Q1
It's a Match, Isn't It? Developing a Checklist on Matching Secondary Data at the Example of Job Control
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A checklist for matching secondary datasets, exemplified by job control data, reveals significant data loss: 993 O*NET-SOC codes matched only 420 Census codes, and full occupational exposure/demographic data was unavailable for 35% of workers in the General Social Survey.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Matching 993 O*NET-SOC codes to 420 U.S. Census occupation codes resulted in significant data reduction.
- Data loss occurred because of a lack of equivalent Census codes and the consolidation of multiple O*NET codes into single Census codes.
- After matching, 35% of workers in the General Social Survey lacked full occupational exposure and sociodemographic data.
- A checklist was developed to guide researchers through the process of matching secondary datasets.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Few datasets simultaneously capture occupational exposures and health outcomes in a general working population. To understand associations between occupational exposures and health, researchers often combine existing datasets. As occupation codes are available in many datasets, combining these datasets seems a straight-forward option. However, the different purposes of these datasets and correspondingly their coding systems may complicate and bias matching procedures by dropping occupations, squeezing multiple occupations into one category, and linking them incorrectly. To develop a checklist that supports an entire research and writing process based on matching datasets, we demonstrate problems that may occur when matching three datasets based on existing crosswalks. Two of these datasets provide unique occupational information: occupational exposure (specifically, job control) from the Occupational Information Network (O*NET) and sociodemographic composition of occupations from the American Community Survey (ACS). After matching them to each other, we used them to enrich workers' health data from the General Social Survey (GSS). This matching process showed that 993 detailed O*NET-SOC codes from 2019 (O*NET-19 codes) matched 420 U.S. Census occupation codes (Census codes). This reduction resulted from two situations: a lack of equivalent Census codes and a consolidation of several O*NET-19 codes under a single Census code. Although we could match occupational data to all workers in GSS, full information on occupational exposure and sociodemographic composition of their jobs was not available for 35% of them. Since our findings are limited to O*NET-based rating of job control, we encourage other researchers to explore scoring of other aspects of occupational exposure and provide a checklist for that purpose.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Occupational Therapy
Occupational TherapyHealth Professions