Natural hazards and earth system sciences· 2026Q1
Spatiotemporal patterns of global earthquake disaster impacts from a human-Earth perspective
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Global earthquake disaster impacts show a decoupling between occurrence and mortality, with fatalities declining markedly after the early 2000s despite increased earthquake frequency and economic losses.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Global earthquake mortality rates declined significantly after the early 2000s, contrasting with rising earthquake frequency, exposed population, and economic losses.
- Asia accounts for a large share of global earthquake impacts, but national-level variations persist even in similar tectonic settings.
- The global earthquake disaster centroid has shifted eastward and southeastward over time, with a modest contraction in spatial dispersion.
- Population density and development/governance indicators are the strongest predictors of national fatality rates in earthquakes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract. Understanding how earthquake disaster impacts reorganize across space and time is essential for interpreting seismic hazards within coupled human-earth systems. Using global disaster records from EM-DAT spanning 1980–2024, this study examines multi-scale spatiotemporal patterns of earthquake disaster impacts and their socio-environmental associations at global and national scales. Temporal analyses show a pronounced decoupling between seismic occurrence and disaster consequences: while earthquake frequency, exposed population, and cumulative economic losses increased overall, mortality rates declined markedly after the early 2000s. Spatial analyses reveal strong heterogeneity across continents, countries, and major tectonic plates. Asia accounts for a substantial share of global earthquake occurrences, affected populations, fatalities, and economic losses, yet national-level impacts vary considerably even under comparable tectonic settings. Standard deviation ellipse and centroid analyses further indicate an eastward to southeastward migration of the global earthquake disaster centroid over time, accompanied by relatively stable orientation and a modest contraction in spatial dispersion. To explore factors associated with national differences in fatalities, a Geographical Detector model is applied using cumulative fatalities as the dependent variable and a set of natural, climatic, socioeconomic, governance, infrastructure, and health-related variables as explanatory factors. Results show that population density and development- and governance-related indicators exhibit relatively high explanatory power, while interactions among factors generally strengthen spatial associations through bilinear or nonlinear enhancement. Overall, the findings suggest that global disparities in earthquake disaster impacts reflect the spatial co-configuration of hazard exposure, development conditions, and institutional capacity, contributing to a system-level understanding of how seismic disaster impacts evolve within coupled human-Earth systems.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Natural hazards and earth system sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Transportation
TransportationSocial Sciences