PofoliaShared via Pofolia

New England Journal of Medicine· 2026Q1

Intermittent or Continuous Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury

Stèphane Gaudry, Marouane Boubaya, Guillaume Louis, Khalil Chaïbi et al.

Short summary

In critically ill adults with acute kidney injury, intermittent hemodialysis was not noninferior to continuous renal-replacement therapy for major adverse kidney events by day 90 and was associated with higher mortality (63.3% vs. 53.6%).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Intermittent hemodialysis was not noninferior to continuous renal-replacement therapy (CRRT) for major adverse kidney events by day 90 in critically ill adults with acute kidney injury.
  • Mortality by day 90 was higher with intermittent hemodialysis (63.3%) than with CRRT (53.6%).
  • The primary outcome, major adverse kidney events, occurred in 78.1% of the intermittent group and 71.6% of the continuous group.
  • Hypotension was the most common complication, occurring in 68.8% of the intermittent group and 66.5% of the continuous group.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BackgroundThe preferred method of renal-replacement therapy for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients remains uncertain. MethodsIn this multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned critically ill adults with acute kidney injury who had indications for renal-replacement therapy to undergo intermittent hemodialysis or continuous renal-replacement therapy as the initial treatment. The primary outcome was a major adverse kidney event — defined as death, dependence on renal-replacement therapy, or a serum creatinine concentration more than 25% above the baseline value — by day 90. ResultsThe trial was stopped early after sequential interim analyses showed a sustained signal of higher mortality with intermittent hemodialysis than with continuous renal-replacement therapy. A total of 554 patients underwent randomization, with 272 patients assigned to undergo intermittent hemodialysis and 282 to undergo continuous renal-replacement therapy; 535 patients (260 in the intermittent group and 275 in the continuous group) were included in the intention-to-treat population. A major adverse kidney event occurred by day 90 in 203 patients (78.1%) in the intermittent group and in 197 patients (71.6%) in the continuous group (adjusted absolute risk difference, 6.28 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.22 to 13.79). Death by day 90 occurred in 164 patients (63.1%) and in 147 patients (53.5%), respectively. Kaplan–Meier mortality estimates at day 90 were 63.3% and 53.6% (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.63). The most common complication potentially related to acute kidney injury or renal-replacement therapy was hypotension, which occurred in 179 patients (68.8%) in the intermittent group and in 183 patients (66.5%) in the continuous group. ConclusionsAmong critically ill patients with acute kidney injury who had indications for renal-replacement therapy, intermittent hemodialysis as the initial treatment approach was not shown to be noninferior to continuous renal-replacement therapy with respect to major adverse kidney events by day 90 and was associated with higher mortality. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health; ICRAKI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT06032884.) Quick Take Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury 2m 14s

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Nephrology

NephrologyMedicine