PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism· 2026Q1

Yi–Han–English trilingual education in junior middle schools under two models in Liangshan

Liuyan Zhou, Gary Bonar

Short summary

In Liangshan junior middle schools, trilingual education (Yi, Mandarin, English) primarily uses Mandarin for instruction and task guidance, Yi for terminology, and English for grammar translation, diverging from policy intentions for integration.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Trilingual education in Liangshan junior middle schools involves Yi, Mandarin, and English.
  • Mandarin is the primary language for instruction and task guidance in classrooms.
  • Yi is mainly used for terminology and literacy, while English is confined to grammar translation.
  • Language integration is frequent in informal talk but scarce in formal instruction.
  • Observed practices diverge from policy intentions, impacting student engagement with written Yi.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

China is a multilingual nation and the current education policy allows minority languages to be used in schooling alongside Mandarin and English in minority regions. Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture implements trilingual education through two models. Model One schools prioritise the Yi language as the primary medium of instruction, whereas Model Two schools rely predominantly on Mandarin. This qualitative case study examines how Yi, Mandarin, and English are used in classroom instruction and informal school spaces in two junior middle schools. Drawing on observations, interviews, and documents, the analysis interprets how practices align with policy along a translanguaging continuum from separation to integration. Across both schools, subject teaching clustered at the separation and translation end. Mandarin served as the default language for explanation and task guidance, Yi was recruited mainly for terminology and literacy, and English was largely confined to grammar translation routines. Integration was common in informal talk across Yi, Sichuanese, and Mandarin but appeared only rarely in instruction. These patterns diverge from trilingual policy intentions and help to explain limited student investment in written Yi. The paper identifies adjustments to assessment, materials, staffing, and classroom design to support planned integration and narrow the gap between practice and policy.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Linguistics and Language

Linguistics and LanguageSocial Sciences