PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Educational Psychology in Practice· 2026Q2

Enactment and evolution of the emotional literacy support assistant (ELSA) standards framework: a case study

Jodie Read, Kevin Woods, Dawn Bradley, Mary Leighton

Short summary

The Emotional Literacy Support Assistant (ELSA) standards framework is dynamically enacted and adapted in practice, with educational psychologists balancing adherence to core requirements with flexible responses to local needs.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • ELSA standards are enacted dynamically and contextually, involving adaptations by practitioners.
  • Educational psychologists balance adherence to core standards with flexible responses to organizational demands.
  • ELSA practitioners engage with standards implicitly through supervision and school culture, differing from educational psychologists' explicit engagement.
  • Variability in interpretation, communication, and supervision expectations challenges consistency across settings.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Recognised United Kingdom (UK)-wide for strengthening schools’ capacity to support pupils’ emotional wellbeing, the emotional literacy support assistant (ELSA) intervention operates within a standards framework established by the ELSA Network. Through a case study of an educational psychology service, this study explores how the ELSA standards are perceived, interpreted, and enacted in real-world contexts, drawing on data collected via interviews and focus groups with educational psychologists and ELSAs. Five categories were identified: standards awareness and communication, standards implementation, standards usefulness, fidelity to the standards and proposed developments. Findings indicate that enactment of the ELSA standards operates as a dynamic and context-dependent process shaped by a continuum of adaptations, with educational psychologists balancing adherence to core requirements with flexible responses to organisational demands. Standards were actively interpreted and negotiated through supervision and local practice, with EPs engaging explicitly with the framework, while ELSAs often engaged more implicitly via supervision and school culture. Variability in interpretation, communication and visibility, particularly around supervision expectations, highlighted challenges to consistency across settings. These findings suggest that strengthening clarity, access and shared understanding of the standards may enhance equity, coherence and implementation fidelity across ELSA practice.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Educational Psychology in Practice, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Speech and Hearing

Speech and HearingHealth Professions