Nature· 2026Q1
SWI/SNF complexes shape 3D chromatin architecture through CTCF and cohesin
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Loss of SWI/SNF (BAF) complexes increases accessibility at CTCF-binding sites, leading to strengthened TAD boundaries and subdivision of large genomic domains into smaller insulated structures.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Loss of SWI/SNF (BAF) complexes increases accessibility at CTCF-binding sites.
- cBAF disruption drives increased CTCF and SMC3 occupancy, indicating antagonism with CTCF-cohesin.
- SWI/SNF loss restructures 3D genome organization, strengthening TAD boundaries and subdividing large domains.
- Enhancer-promoter loops are replaced by shorter, promoter-proximal loops anchored at CTCF-enriched sites.
- Conditional Arid1a deletion in mouse cells expanded a proliferative population, reversed by Ctcf or Pbrm1 deletion.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract The BAF (also known as mammalian SWI/SNF) chromatin remodelling complexes are essential regulators of nucleosome positioning and transcription factor binding 1,2 . Loss-of-function (LOF) mutations in genes encoding components of the BAF complexes are among the most frequent across cancer types 3 . However, a unifying mechanism that explains their widespread disruption remains unclear. Here we disrupted BAF function through pharmacological inhibition and ARID1A deletion across various mammalian cell types and tissues and observed a conserved chromatin response: increased accessibility at CTCF-binding sites. ARID1A LOF alone was sufficient to drive these changes, which demonstrates that canonical BAF (cBAF) disruption is the key driver of CTCF gain. Genomic profiling showed increased CTCF and SMC3 occupancy, which reveals an antagonistic relationship between cBAF and CTCF–cohesin complexes. Furthermore, cBAF loss restructured 3D genome organization, which led to a strengthening of topologically associating domain boundaries and subdivision of large domains into smaller insulated structures. Long-range enhancer–promoter loops were replaced by shorter, promoter-proximal loops anchored at CTCF-enriched sites. To determine how CTCF function is enabled following cBAF loss, we profiled CTCF-interacting cofactors and found that CTCF binds directly to fully assembled PBAF. After cBAF depletion, PBAF was recruited to sites of increased CTCF occupancy, which demonstrates that there is an antagonistic switch between SWI/SNF subcomplexes. In vivo, conditional Arid1a deletion in primary mouse cells resulted in the expansion of a highly proliferative population marked by elevated accessibility at CTCF sites. This phenotype was fully reversed by either Ctcf or Pbrm1 deletion, which establishes that cBAF and the activity of CTCF and PBAF have contrasting roles.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Nature, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Molecular Biology
Molecular BiologyBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology