Allergy and Asthma Proceedings· 2026Q2
Atopic biologic use and recalled irritable bowel syndrome symptom severity: A hypothesis generating retrospective survey evaluation
- 1citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Patients taking biologics for atopy reported a significant decrease in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptom severity (median difference of 70.0 in IBS-SSS) after starting treatment, with omalizumab showing the largest observed difference.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Atopic biologics were associated with a significant decrease in recalled IBS symptom severity (median IBS-SSS difference of 70.0).
- 56% of patients reported a decrease of at least 50 points in IBS-SSS post-biologic treatment.
- Omalizumab showed the largest median IBS-SSS difference (93.8) among patients, though not statistically significant in the subset.
- The frequency of patients reporting adequate IBS relief did not change significantly.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Background: Case reports indicate that omalizumab may be therapeutic in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but this has not been confirmed with follow-up studies. Objective: The present study sought to determine if biologics used to treat atopy have any effect on recalled IBS severity. Methods: All patients ≥ 12 years of age with IBS and currently taking an atopic biologic were sent a questionnaire that assesses IBS severity currently and before starting their atopic biologic. The IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) and IBS Adequate Relief metric were used to quantify IBS severity pre- and post-atopic biologic. Bonferroni-corrected Wilcoxon signed rank tests with Hodges-Lehman estimated median differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) compared IBS-SSS pre- and post-atopic biologic start. Subset analyses of patients taking omalizumab or dupliumab were also conducted. Results: Sixteen patients (12% response rate) fully responded to the questionnaire (omalizumab, n = 7; dupilumab, n = 7; mepolizumab, n = 1; tezepelumab, n = 1). The majority were women (75%) with a median (range) age of 41 years (22‐71 years). The frequency of respondents who reported adequate relief of their IBS did not differ pre- and post-atopic biologic start (p = 0.688), but patients reported significantly decreased IBS-SSS post-atopic biologic start (estimated median difference 70.0 [95% CI, 20.0‐122.5]; z = −2.59, p = 0.0097). One patient (6%) taking omalizumab reported complete resolution of IBS symptoms. The majority of the patients (56%) reported a decrease of at least 50 in the IBS-SSS. Although subset analyses of patients taking omalizumab or dupilumab did not show statistically significant differences pre- and post-atopic biologic start, the estimated median IBS-SSS difference pre- and post-atopic biologic start was 93.8 (95% CI, −15.5 to 201.5) and 22.0 (95% CI, −27.5 to 149.0) for omalizumab and dupilumab, respectively. Conclusion: The patients with IBS reported improved recalled IBS severity after starting an atopic biologic, with patients taking omalizumab reporting a larger difference. Future controlled studies are needed to confirm this finding.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Allergy and Asthma Proceedings, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Gastroenterology
GastroenterologyMedicine