PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Analytical Chemistry· 2026Q1

Stoichiometry-Dependent Specificity in Biotin Enrichment: A Benchmarking Framework for Proximity-Labeling Proteomics

Christopher Arpad Zala, María Cristina Trueba Sánchez, Jelle van den Bor, Tijmen Willemsens et al.

Short summary

A new benchmarking framework reveals that biotin enrichment specificity in proximity labeling proteomics is highly dependent on biotin stoichiometry, with higher biotinylation levels yielding greater specificity and lower levels increasing non-specific background.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Established a quantitative benchmarking framework to evaluate biotin enrichment specificity in proximity labeling proteomics.
  • Demonstrated that enrichment specificity is directly dependent on biotin stoichiometry: higher biotinylation leads to higher specificity.
  • Showed that low biotinylation levels significantly increase non-specific protein binding, compromising data quality.
  • Found that reduced protein input limits target recovery but maintains enrichment specificity, highlighting sensitivity constraints.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Proximity labeling methods (including, BioID, TurboID, ultraID), along with surface proteomics and microdomain mapping, enable proteome-wide identification of spatially proximal proteins via MS-based analysis. These workflows require specific enrichment of biotinylated proteins using affinity purification, yet enrichment specificity can often be compromised by non-specifically bound proteins. As labeling strategies are increasingly applied to complex biological samples with low protein input or low biotin stoichiometry, accurately distinguishing true targets from background becomes a major analytical challenge. Despite its critical impact on data quality and interpretation, the influence of biotinylation level and protein input on enrichment performance remains poorly characterized, limiting the reliability of proximity labeling experiments. To address this, we establish a quantitative benchmarking framework that systematically evaluates biotin enrichment under controlled conditions, including scenarios of low biotin stoichiometry. Using this setup, we show that enrichment specificity strongly depends on biotin stoichiometry: higher levels of biotinylation in samples yield high specificity, whereas low biotinylation increases non-specific background. Reduced protein input further limits recovery of true targets, yet maintains enrichment specificity, highlighting sensitivity constraints of enrichment-based workflows. We apply this framework to biotinylated extracellular vesicle (EV) cargo uptake in recipient cells using ultraID-CD63 labeling. Detection of the most abundant EV cargo proteins under low biotinylation conditions indicates that current workflows approach the lower bounds of biotin enrichment sensitivity. Together, these standards provide a practical reference for evaluating and optimizing biotin enrichment workflows, supporting quantitative and reproducible proximity labeling in proteomics.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Analytical Chemistry, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Cell Biology

Cell BiologyBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology