European Journal Of Dental Education· 2026Q1· Review
Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom and Traditional Didactic Classroom in Paediatric Dentistry Education—A Systematic Review With Meta‐Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A meta-analysis of four RCTs found that the Flipped Classroom (FC) model significantly improved knowledge acquisition in pediatric dentistry education by 0.54 standard deviations compared to traditional didactic methods (p=0.001).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Flipped Classroom (FC) teaching significantly improved knowledge acquisition in pediatric dentistry education compared to traditional methods (Hedges' g = 0.54, p=0.001).
- The meta-analysis included four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified from PubMed, Scopus, and EBSCOhost.
- The overall risk of bias in the included studies was moderate, primarily due to limitations in randomization and blinding.
- No statistical heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I² = 0%).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
ABSTRACT Introduction The flipped classroom (FC) is a contemporary teaching strategy that has gained considerable attention in recent years. This model relies on technology‐based resources, including videos and handouts, to deliver illustrative content and core subject material to learners. Given the current emphasis on enhancing both undergraduate and postgraduate education, it is imperative to evaluate the usefulness of FC in the field of paediatric dentistry. Aim To compare the effectiveness of the FC with the didactic classroom in paediatric dentistry education. Methodology This systematic review and meta‐analysis adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and EBSCOhost databases. Titles and abstracts were screened, and relevant data were extracted using a standardised form. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2.0) was applied. A fixed‐effects meta‐analysis using standardised mean difference (Hedges' g) was performed for studies comparing flipped and traditional teaching methods. Results Among 101 identified studies, four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) fulfilled eligibility criteria. The overall risk of bias was moderate due to limitations in randomisation and blinding. Quantitative synthesis of post‐intervention knowledge assessment scores demonstrated that the FC significantly improved learning outcomes compared to traditional teaching (Hedges' g = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.22–0.87, p = 0.001), with no evidence of heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%). Conclusions FC strategies, incorporating interactive and discussion‐based learning, demonstrated a moderate improvement in knowledge acquisition compared to traditional teaching methods. However, further high‐quality RCTs need to be conducted using different techniques under FC education.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. European Journal Of Dental Education, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Education
EducationSocial Sciences