PofoliaShared via Pofolia

JAMA· 2013Q1

Lutein + Zeaxanthin and Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Short summary

Adding lutein + zeaxanthin or omega-3 fatty acids (DHA + EPA) to the AREDS formulation did not significantly reduce the progression of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) over 5 years in a study of 4203 participants.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Adding lutein + zeaxanthin or DHA + EPA to the AREDS formulation did not significantly reduce the 5-year risk of advanced AMD progression (31% placebo vs. 29-31% intervention groups).
  • No significant effect on AMD progression was observed from eliminating beta carotene or lowering the zinc dose in the AREDS formulation.
  • A higher incidence of lung cancer was observed in the beta carotene group (2.0%) compared to the no beta carotene group (0.9%), primarily in former smokers.
  • Lutein + zeaxanthin may serve as a suitable carotenoid substitute in the AREDS formulation due to the potential lung cancer risk associated with beta carotene.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Oral supplementation with the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) formulation (antioxidant vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc) has been shown to reduce the risk of progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Observational data suggest that increased dietary intake of lutein + zeaxanthin (carotenoids), omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (docosahexaenoic acid [DHA] + eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA]), or both might further reduce this risk. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether adding lutein + zeaxanthin, DHA + EPA, or both to the AREDS formulation decreases the risk of developing advanced AMD and to evaluate the effect of eliminating beta carotene, lowering zinc doses, or both in the AREDS formulation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2), a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled phase 3 study with a 2 × 2 factorial design, conducted in 2006-2012 and enrolling 4203 participants aged 50 to 85 years at risk for progression to advanced AMD with bilateral large drusen or large drusen in 1 eye and advanced AMD in the fellow eye. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to receive lutein (10 mg) + zeaxanthin (2 mg), DHA (350 mg) + EPA (650 mg), lutein + zeaxanthin and DHA + EPA, or placebo. All participants were also asked to take the original AREDS formulation or accept a secondary randomization to 4 variations of the AREDS formulation, including elimination of beta carotene, lowering of zinc dose, or both. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Development of advanced AMD. The unit of analyses used was by eye. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 5 years, with 1940 study eyes (1608 participants) progressing to advanced AMD. Kaplan-Meier probabilities of progression to advanced AMD by 5 years were 31% (493 eyes [406 participants]) for placebo, 29% (468 eyes [399 participants]) for lutein + zeaxanthin, 31% (507 eyes [416 participants]) for DHA + EPA, and 30% (472 eyes [387 participants]) for lutein + zeaxanthin and DHA + EPA. Comparison with placebo in the primary analyses demonstrated no statistically significant reduction in progression to advanced AMD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90 [98.7% CI, 0.76-1.07]; P = .12 for lutein + zeaxanthin; 0.97 [98.7% CI, 0.82-1.16]; P = .70 for DHA + EPA; 0.89 [98.7% CI, 0.75-1.06]; P = .10 for lutein + zeaxanthin and DHA + EPA). There was no apparent effect of beta carotene elimination or lower-dose zinc on progression to advanced AMD. More lung cancers were noted in the beta carotene vs no beta carotene group (23 [2.0%] vs 11 [0.9%], nominal P = .04), mostly in former smokers. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Addition of lutein + zeaxanthin, DHA + EPA, or both to the AREDS formulation in primary analyses did not further reduce risk of progression to advanced AMD. However, because of potential increased incidence of lung cancer in former smokers, lutein + zeaxanthin could be an appropriate carotenoid substitute in the AREDS formulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00345176.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. JAMA, 2013 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Biochemistry (Medicine)

BiochemistryMedicine