PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Frontiers in Immunology· 2018Q1

Role of C-Reactive Protein at Sites of Inflammation and Infection

Nicola R. Sproston, Jason Ashworth

Short summary

Native CRP (nCRP) and monomeric CRP (mCRP) isoforms exhibit opposing functions at sites of inflammation and infection, with nCRP generally anti-inflammatory and mCRP pro-inflammatory.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Native CRP (nCRP) and monomeric CRP (mCRP) are distinct isoforms of C-reactive protein.
  • nCRP exhibits anti-inflammatory effects, activating complement, promoting phagocytosis, and inducing apoptosis.
  • mCRP has pro-inflammatory effects, recruiting leukocytes and delaying apoptosis.
  • The isoforms have opposing effects on nitric oxide (NO) production and differential impacts on cytokine release (e.g., mCRP increases IL-8).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute inflammatory protein that increases up to 1,000-fold at sites of infection or inflammation. CRP is produced as a homopentameric protein, termed native CRP (nCRP), which can irreversibly dissociate at sites of inflammation and infection into five separate monomers, termed monomeric CRP (mCRP). CRP is synthesized primarily in liver hepatocytes but also by smooth muscle cells, macrophages, endothelial cells, lymphocytes, and adipocytes. Evidence suggests that estrogen in the form of hormone replacement therapy influences CRP levels in the elderly. Having been traditionally utilized as a marker of infection and cardiovascular events, there is now growing evidence that CRP plays important roles in inflammatory processes and host responses to infection including the complement pathway, apoptosis, phagocytosis, nitric oxide (NO) release, and the production of cytokines, particularly interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α. Unlike more recent publications, the findings of early work on CRP can seem somewhat unclear and at times conflicting since it was often not specified which particular CRP isoform was measured or utilized in experiments and whether responses attributed to nCRP were in fact possibly due to dissociation into mCRP or lipopolysaccharide contamination. In addition, since antibodies for mCRP are not commercially available, few laboratories are able to conduct studies investigating the mCRP isoform. Despite these issues and the fact that most CRP research to date has focused on vascular disorders, there is mounting evidence that CRP isoforms have distinct biological properties, with nCRP often exhibiting more anti-inflammatory activities compared to mCRP. The nCRP isoform activates the classical complement pathway, induces phagocytosis, and promotes apoptosis. On the other hand, mCRP promotes the chemotaxis and recruitment of circulating leukocytes to areas of inflammation and can delay apoptosis. The nCRP and mCRP isoforms work in opposing directions to inhibit and induce NO production, respectively. In terms of pro-inflammatory cytokine production, mCRP increases interleukin-8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 production, whereas nCRP has no detectable effect on their levels. Further studies are needed to expand on these emerging findings and to fully characterize the differential roles that each CRP isoform plays at sites of local inflammation and infection.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Frontiers in Immunology, 2018 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Epidemiology

EpidemiologyMedicine