PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Journal of Epidemiology· 2015Q1

Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)

Emily Herrett, Arlene M. Gallagher, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Harriet Forbes et al.

Short summary

The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) is a UK primary care database covering over 11.3 million patients, with 4.4 million active and representative of the UK population, offering rich data for epidemiological research.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • CPRD is an ongoing UK primary care database with over 11.3 million patient records.
  • 4.4 million patients are active and representative of the UK population by age, sex, and ethnicity.
  • Data includes demographics, symptoms, tests, diagnoses, therapies, behaviours, and referrals.
  • Linkage with secondary care, cohort, and mortality data expands research potential.
  • CPRD has supported over 1000 epidemiological research studies.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) is an ongoing primary care database of anonymised medical records from general practitioners, with coverage of over 11.3 million patients from 674 practices in the UK. With 4.4 million active (alive, currently registered) patients meeting quality criteria, approximately 6.9% of the UK population are included and patients are broadly representative of the UK general population in terms of age, sex and ethnicity. General practitioners are the gatekeepers of primary care and specialist referrals in the UK. The CPRD primary care database is therefore a rich source of health data for research, including data on demographics, symptoms, tests, diagnoses, therapies, health-related behaviours and referrals to secondary care. For over half of patients, linkage with datasets from secondary care, disease-specific cohorts and mortality records enhance the range of data available for research. The CPRD is very widely used internationally for epidemiological research and has been used to produce over 1000 research studies, published in peer-reviewed journals across a broad range of health outcomes. However, researchers must be aware of the complexity of routinely collected electronic health records, including ways to manage variable completeness, misclassification and development of disease definitions for research.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2015 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Epidemiology

EpidemiologyMedicine