PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Clinical Oncology· 2013Q1

Deintensification Candidate Subgroups in Human Papillomavirus–Related Oropharyngeal Cancer According to Minimal Risk of Distant Metastasis

Brian O’Sullivan, Shao Hui Huang, Lillian L. Siu, John Waldron et al.

Short summary

HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients with T1-3N0-2c staging have a low distant metastasis (DM) risk, but those with N2c substage show reduced distant control (DC) with radiotherapy (RT) alone (73%) versus chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (92%), suggesting they are less suited for deintensification strategies omitting chemotherapy.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients with T1-3N0-2c staging have a low distant metastasis (DM) risk.
  • Within the T1-3N0-2c group, HPV-positive patients with N2c substage showed reduced distant control (DC) with RT alone (73%) compared to CRT (92%).
  • HPV negativity, N2b-N3, T4, and RT alone predicted lower recurrence-free survival (RFS).
  • Smoking pack-years > 10 reduced overall survival but did not impact RFS.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define human papillomavirus (HPV) -positive oropharyngeal cancers (OPC) suitable for treatment deintensification according to low risk of distant metastasis (DM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: OPC treated with radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) from 2001 to 2009 were included. Outcomes were compared for HPV-positive versus HPV-negative patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified outcome predictors. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) stratified the DM risk. RESULTS: HPV status was ascertained in 505 (56%) of 899 consecutive OPCs. Median follow-up was 3.9 years. HPV-positive patients (n = 382), compared with HPV-negative patients (n = 123), had higher local (94% v 80%, respectively, at 3 years; P < .01) and regional control (95% v 82%, respectively; P < .01) but similar distant control (DC; 90% v 86%, respectively; P = .53). Multivariate analysis identified that HPV negativity (hazard ratio [HR], 2.9; 95% CI, 2.0 to 5.0), N2b-N3 (HR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.8 to 4.9), T4 (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.9), and RT alone (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.5) predicted a lower recurrence-free survival (RFS; all P < .01). Smoking pack-years > 10 reduced overall survival (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.7; P = .03) but did not impact RFS (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.9; P = .65). RPA segregated HPV-positive patients into low (T1-3N0-2c; DC, 93%) and high DM risk (N3 or T4; DC, 76%) groups and HPV-negative patients into different low (T1-2N0-2c; DC, 93%) and high DM risk (T3-4N3; DC, 72%) groups. The DC rates for HPV-positive, low-risk N0-2a or less than 10 pack-year N2b patients were similar for RT alone and CRT, but the rate was lower in the N2c subset managed by RT alone (73% v 92% for CRT; P = .02). CONCLUSION: HPV-positive T1-3N0-2c patients have a low DM risk, but N2c patients from this group have a reduced DC when treated with RT alone and seem less suited for deintensification strategies that omit chemotherapy.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2013 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Otorhinolaryngology

OtorhinolaryngologyMedicine