New England Journal of Medicine· 2016Q1
Osimertinib or Platinum–Pemetrexed in <i>EGFR</i> T790M–Positive Lung Cancer
- 3,340citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2016year
Short summary
Osimertinib significantly improved progression-free survival (10.1 vs. 4.4 months) and objective response rate (71% vs. 31%) compared to platinum-pemetrexed in patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who progressed on prior EGFR-TKI therapy.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Osimertinib extended median progression-free survival to 10.1 months versus 4.4 months for platinum-pemetrexed (HR 0.30, P<0.001).
- Objective response rate was 71% with osimertinib compared to 31% with platinum-pemetrexed (OR 5.39, P<0.001).
- In patients with CNS metastases, osimertinib also showed longer progression-free survival (8.5 vs. 4.2 months).
- Grade 3 or higher adverse events were less frequent with osimertinib (23%) than with platinum-pemetrexed (47%).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is selective for both EGFR-TKI sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. The efficacy of osimertinib as compared with platinum-based therapy plus pemetrexed in such patients is unknown. METHODS: In this randomized, international, open-label, phase 3 trial, we assigned 419 patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, who had disease progression after first-line EGFR-TKI therapy, in a 2:1 ratio to receive either oral osimertinib (at a dose of 80 mg once daily) or intravenous pemetrexed (500 mg per square meter of body-surface area) plus either carboplatin (target area under the curve, 5 [AUC5]) or cisplatin (75 mg per square meter) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles; maintenance pemetrexed was allowed. In all the patients, disease had progressed during receipt of first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. RESULTS: The median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer with osimertinib than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (10.1 months vs. 4.4 months; hazard ratio; 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.41; P<0.001). The objective response rate was significantly better with osimertinib (71%; 95% CI, 65 to 76) than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (31%; 95% CI, 24 to 40) (odds ratio for objective response, 5.39; 95% CI, 3.47 to 8.48; P<0.001). Among 144 patients with metastases to the central nervous system (CNS), the median duration of progression-free survival was longer among patients receiving osimertinib than among those receiving platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (8.5 months vs. 4.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.49). The proportion of patients with adverse events of grade 3 or higher was lower with osimertinib (23%) than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (47%). CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib had significantly greater efficacy than platinum therapy plus pemetrexed in patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (including those with CNS metastases) in whom disease had progressed during first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. (Funded by AstraZeneca; AURA3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02151981 .).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2016 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Pulmonary and Respiratory MedicineMedicine