PofoliaShared via Pofolia

New England Journal of Medicine· 2014Q1

First-Line Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in <i>ALK</i>-Positive Lung Cancer

Benjamin Solomon, Tony Mok, Dong‐Wan Kim, Yi‐Long Wu et al.

Short summary

First-line crizotinib significantly extended progression-free survival (PFS) by 3.9 months (median 10.9 vs. 7.0 months) and improved objective response rates (74% vs. 45%) compared to standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Crizotinib extended median progression-free survival to 10.9 months versus 7.0 months for chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.45, P<0.001).
  • Objective response rates were 74% for crizotinib and 45% for chemotherapy (P<0.001).
  • Crizotinib showed a trend towards improved overall survival, with 84% 1-year survival versus 79% for chemotherapy.
  • Crizotinib was associated with greater reduction in lung cancer symptoms and improvement in quality of life.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of the ALK inhibitor crizotinib as compared with standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unknown. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, phase 3 trial comparing crizotinib with chemotherapy in 343 patients with advanced ALK-positive nonsquamous NSCLC who had received no previous systemic treatment for advanced disease. Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral crizotinib at a dose of 250 mg twice daily or to receive intravenous chemotherapy (pemetrexed, 500 mg per square meter of body-surface area, plus either cisplatin, 75 mg per square meter, or carboplatin, target area under the curve of 5 to 6 mg per milliliter per minute) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. Crossover to crizotinib treatment after disease progression was permitted for patients receiving chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by independent radiologic review. RESULTS: Progression-free survival was significantly longer with crizotinib than with chemotherapy (median, 10.9 months vs. 7.0 months; hazard ratio for progression or death with crizotinib, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.60; P<0.001). Objective response rates were 74% and 45%, respectively (P<0.001). Median overall survival was not reached in either group (hazard ratio for death with crizotinib, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.26; P=0.36); the probability of 1-year survival was 84% with crizotinib and 79% with chemotherapy. The most common adverse events with crizotinib were vision disorders, diarrhea, nausea, and edema, and the most common events with chemotherapy were nausea, fatigue, vomiting, and decreased appetite. As compared with chemotherapy, crizotinib was associated with greater reduction in lung cancer symptoms and greater improvement in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Crizotinib was superior to standard first-line pemetrexed-plus-platinum chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. (Funded by Pfizer; PROFILE 1014 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01154140.).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2014 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Pulmonary and Respiratory MedicineMedicine