British Journal of Sports Medicine· 2019Q1· Review
What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines: systematic review
- 1,040citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2019year
Short summary
A systematic review of high-quality clinical practice guidelines identified 11 consistent recommendations for managing common musculoskeletal pain sites, emphasizing patient-centered care, selective imaging, and active management.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Eleven consistent recommendations for musculoskeletal pain management were identified from high-quality clinical practice guidelines.
- Key recommendations include patient-centered care, screening for red flags, and assessing psychosocial factors.
- Selective use of imaging and emphasis on physical examination are advised.
- Education, exercise, and keeping patients at work are crucial components of care.
- Manual therapy should be an adjunct, and non-surgical options prioritized before surgery.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To identify common recommendations for high-quality care for the most common musculoskeletal (MSK) pain sites encountered by clinicians in emergency and primary care (spinal (lumbar, thoracic and cervical), hip/knee (including osteoarthritis [OA] and shoulder) from contemporary, high-quality clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). DESIGN: Systematic review, critical appraisal and narrative synthesis of MSK pain CPG recommendations. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Included MSK pain CPGs were written in English, rated as high quality, published from 2011, focused on adults and described development processes. Excluded CPGs were for: traumatic MSK pain, single modalities (eg, surgery), traditional healing/medicine, specific disease processes (eg, inflammatory arthropathies) or those that required payment. DATA SOURCES: Four scientific databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Physiotherapy Evidence Database) and four guideline repositories. RESULTS: 6232 records were identified, 44 CPGs were appraised and 11 were rated as high quality (low back pain: 4, OA: 4, neck: 2 and shoulder: 1). We identified 11 recommendations for MSK pain care: ensure care is patient centred, screen for red flag conditions, assess psychosocial factors, use imaging selectively, undertake a physical examination, monitor patient progress, provide education/information, address physical activity/exercise, use manual therapy only as an adjunct to other treatments, offer high-quality non-surgical care prior to surgery and try to keep patients at work. CONCLUSION: These 11 recommendations guide healthcare consumers, clinicians, researchers and policy makers to manage MSK pain. This should improve the quality of care of MSK pain.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2019 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Rehabilitation
RehabilitationMedicine