Obesity Reviews· 2015Q1
Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain: a meta‐analytic review
- 703citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2015year
Short summary
Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain, explaining approximately 11% of variance in outcomes (r = 0.33).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Food cue reactivity and craving explain 11% of the variance in eating and weight gain.
- The overall predictive effect size was medium (r = 0.33).
- Both tonic and cue-induced craving predict eating behavior (r = 0.33).
- Visual food cues had a stronger association with outcomes than olfactory cues.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
According to learning-based models of behavior, food cue reactivity and craving are conditioned responses that lead to increased eating and subsequent weight gain. However, evidence supporting this relationship has been mixed. We conducted a quantitative meta-analysis to assess the predictive effects of food cue reactivity and craving on eating and weight-related outcomes. Across 69 reported statistics from 45 published reports representing 3,292 participants, we found an overall medium effect of food cue reactivity and craving on outcomes (r = 0.33, p < 0.001; approximately 11% of variance), suggesting that cue exposure and the experience of craving significantly influence and contribute to eating behavior and weight gain. Follow-up tests revealed a medium effect size for the effect of both tonic and cue-induced craving on eating behavior (r = 0.33). We did not find significant differences in effect sizes based on body mass index, age, or dietary restraint. However, we did find that visual food cues (e.g. pictures and videos) were associated with a similar effect size to real food exposure and a stronger effect size than olfactory cues. Overall, the present findings suggest that food cue reactivity, cue-induced craving and tonic craving systematically and prospectively predict food-related outcomes. These results have theoretical, methodological, public health and clinical implications.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Obesity Reviews, 2015 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Sensory Systems
Sensory SystemsNeuroscience