PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Work· 2026Q2

Exploring rehabilitation therapists’ knowledge and perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning for persons post-stroke

Elena V. Donoso Brown, Min Hun Lee, Kasey E. Stepansky, Hannah Fairchild et al.

Short summary

Rehabilitation therapists see potential for AI/ML in stroke care, but are uncertain about implementation, cost, and support, desiring more education.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Therapists recognize AI/ML's potential to enhance stroke rehabilitation through personalized therapy and better data analysis.
  • Qualitative analysis identified four key themes: current practices, perceptions of AI/ML, future outlook, and implementation needs.
  • Survey data showed therapists' current technology use and perceptions of AI/ML.
  • Therapists are uncertain about the timeline, methods, and costs associated with AI/ML implementation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Background The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) within the clinical work of rehabilitation therapists in post stroke rehabilitation has the potential to transform their work performance, habits, and routines. The impact could potentially enhance integration of assessment/data analysis, personalizing therapies, documentation, and promoting home program adherence. Objective This study assesses occupational and physical therapists’ current perspectives on AI/ML in post-stroke clinical rehabilitation and examines perceived barriers to potential application of AI/ML in their clinical work. Methods This mixed methods study includes quantitative survey data collected pre/post an AI/ML educational webinar, as well as qualitative focus group analysis that includes therapist attitudes and experiences with AI/ML, practical applications to using AI/ML, as well as the difficulties associated. The recruited therapists include occupational and physical therapy practitioners from the United States and Asia. Individuals included in the study had to have a caseload of 30% persons with stroke. Results Four key themes emerged from qualitative analysis: 1) current clinical work practice and identified gaps, 2) current therapists’ perceptions of AI/ML, 3) perceived future of AI/ML in clinical work practices and 4) steps needed for implementation. Survey data reporting frequencies of technology use and AI/ML perceptions are integrated into qualitative findings. Conclusions Therapists can articulate potential future uses for AI/ML technology in post-stroke rehabilitation, however, remain uncertain about when, how, and at what cost utilization will be supported in clinical work environments. Therapists desire education and support to utilize the evolving technologies in practice.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Work, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Rehabilitation

RehabilitationMedicine