International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy· 2026Q1
Factors Affecting Clinical Decision Making for Blood Flow Restriction Training in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Nearly half (55%) of physical therapists surveyed would not use blood flow restriction training (BFRT) on younger patients post-ACL injury, primarily due to concerns about patient tolerance (90%) and pain (71%).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- 55% of surveyed physical therapists would not use BFRT on younger patients post-ACL injury.
- Patient tolerance (90%) and pain (71%) were the primary concerns influencing BFRT application.
- Most PTs (97%) initiate BFRT around week 4 post-surgery.
- Only 52% of PTs have defined criteria for discontinuing BFRT use.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Background: Research evaluating the effectiveness of blood flow restriction training (BFRT) in patients post anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is growing, but the application of BFRT within clinical settings remains unknown. Understanding how BFRT is used in the pediatric and adolescent populations and what exercise prescription is followed is necessary to discern if there is concordance between research and clinical practice. Hypothesis/Purpose: To describe the influence of patient clinical presentation on BFRT use in pediatric and adolescent patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Study Design: Cross-sectional survey study. Methods: A web-based survey was sent to physical therapists (PTs) who treat pediatric and adolescent patients after ACL injury, via social media and email sent out by rehabilitation continuing education providers. Case vignettes were utilized to understand clinical decisions related to BFRT utilization. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize frequency of responses. Results: One hundred forty-seven PTs fully completed the survey. Nearly half (55%) of participants indicated they would not use BFRT on younger patients, mostly out of concern for patient tolerance (90%). Pain impacted BFRT application for 71% of participants, with only 19% of clinicians using BFRT with patients reporting pain greater than 6/10. Postoperatively, participants were most likely to initiate BFRT at week 4 with this population (97%), while only 52% of participants indicated that they have defined criteria for discontinuing BFRT. Conclusion: Younger age, pain, and time from surgery influenced decision making. There were no consistent criteria utilized to determine proper timing to discontinue use of BFRT. These findings support the need for additional research to identify optimal BFRT application within common clinical scenarios, which will help standardize practice and support clinical decision making when utilizing BFRT in adolescents after ACL reconstruction. Level of Evidence: 3.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Complementary and alternative medicine
Complementary and alternative medicineMedicine