PofoliaShared via Pofolia

The Leadership Quarterly· 2018Q1· Review

Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research

Nathan Eva, Mulyadi Robin, Sen Sendjaya, Dirk van Dierendonck et al.

Short summary

This systematic review of 285 articles (1998-2018) clarifies the servant leadership construct, evaluates 16 measurement tools, maps its theoretical network, and proposes a future research agenda.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Reviews 285 servant leadership articles published between 1998 and 2018.
  • Provides a new definition for servant leadership and distinguishes it from similar leadership styles.
  • Evaluates the psychometric properties of 16 existing servant leadership scales.
  • Maps the antecedents, outcomes, moderators, and mediators of servant leadership.
  • Outlines a future research agenda for theoretical and empirical development.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Notwithstanding the proliferation of servant leadership studies with over 100 articles published in the last four years alone, a lack of coherence and clarity around the construct has impeded its theory development. We provide an integrative and comprehensive review of the 285 articles on servant leadership spanning 20 years (1998–2018), and in so doing extend the field in four different ways. First, we provide a conceptual clarity of servant leadership vis-à-vis other value-based leadership approaches and offer a new definition of servant leadership. Second, we evaluate 16 existing measures of servant leadership in light of their respective rigor of scale construction and validation. Third, we map the theoretical and nomological network of servant leadership in relation to its antecedents, outcomes, moderators, mediators. We finally conclude by presenting a detailed future research agenda to bring the field forward encompassing both theoretical and empirical advancement. All in all, our review paints a holistic picture of where the literature has been and where it should go into the future.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Leadership Quarterly, 2018 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementBusiness, Management and Accounting