The Lancet Public Health· 2020Q1
Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths, and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study
- 977citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2020year
Short summary
A modelling study simulating 664 million people in the UK suggests that combining school closures, physical distancing, shielding the elderly, and self-isolation could have substantially reduced COVID-19 cases, hospital demand, and deaths.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A stochastic age-structured transmission model simulated 664 million people across the UK.
- Four base interventions modelled were school closures, physical distancing, shielding the elderly, and symptomatic self-isolation.
- Combined interventions, especially phased lockdown-type restrictions, were projected to substantially limit contacts and reduce epidemic burden.
- The study estimated the impact of interventions on new cases, hospital/ICU demand, and deaths, and their effect on R0.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Background Non-pharmaceutical interventions have been implemented to reduce transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the UK. Projecting the size of an unmitigated epidemic and the potential effect of different control measures has been crucial to support evidence-based policy making during the early stages of the epidemic. This study assesses the potential impact of different control measures for mitigating the burden of COVID-19 in the UK. Methods We used a stochastic age-structured transmission model to explore a range of intervention scenarios, tracking 664 million people aggregated to 186 county-level administrative units in England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. The four base interventions modelled were school closures, physical distancing, shielding of people aged 70 years or older, and self-isolation of symptomatic cases. We also modelled the combination of these interventions, as well as a programme of intensive interventions with phased lockdown-type restrictions that substantially limited contacts outside of the home for repeated periods. We simulated different triggers for the introduction of interventions, and estimated the impact of varying adherence to interventions across counties. For each scenario, we projected estimated new cases over time, patients requiring inpatient and critical care (ie, admission to the intensive care units [ICU]) treatment, and deaths, and compared the effect of each intervention on the basic reproduction number, R 0 .
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Lancet Public Health, 2020 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Modeling and Simulation
Modeling and SimulationMathematics