PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Antioxidants and Redox Signaling· 2015Q1

Clinical Relevance of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress

Jeroen Frijhoff, Paul G. Winyard, Neven Žarković, Sean S. Davies et al.

Short summary

Despite numerous methods to measure oxidative stress, drawing general conclusions on its clinical significance is difficult due to heterogeneous literature, inconsistent biomarker use across diseases, and a gap between sophisticated specific methods and routine clinical application.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Oxidative stress is a key component in various diseases.
  • A wide array of methods exist to measure oxidative stress markers (DNA, proteins, lipids, amino acids).
  • Heterogeneity in literature and inconsistent biomarker usage across diseases hinder general conclusions.
  • A gap exists between sophisticated, specific methods and routine clinical applicability.
  • Validation of positive findings in larger cohorts and comparison with clinical standards are needed for biomarker adoption.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE: Oxidative stress is considered to be an important component of various diseases. A vast number of methods have been developed and used in virtually all diseases to measure the extent and nature of oxidative stress, ranging from oxidation of DNA to proteins, lipids, and free amino acids. RECENT ADVANCES: An increased understanding of the biology behind diseases and redox biology has led to more specific and sensitive tools to measure oxidative stress markers, which are very diverse and sometimes very low in abundance. CRITICAL ISSUES: The literature is very heterogeneous. It is often difficult to draw general conclusions on the significance of oxidative stress biomarkers, as only in a limited proportion of diseases have a range of different biomarkers been used, and different biomarkers have been used to study different diseases. In addition, biomarkers are often measured using nonspecific methods, while specific methodologies are often too sophisticated or laborious for routine clinical use. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Several markers of oxidative stress still represent a viable biomarker opportunity for clinical use. However, positive findings with currently used biomarkers still need to be validated in larger sample sizes and compared with current clinical standards to establish them as clinical diagnostics. It is important to realize that oxidative stress is a nuanced phenomenon that is difficult to characterize, and one biomarker is not necessarily better than others. The vast diversity in oxidative stress between diseases and conditions has to be taken into account when selecting the most appropriate biomarker.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, 2015 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Biochemistry (Medicine)

BiochemistryMedicine