PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Circulation· 2016Q1

2016 Focused Update: Clinical Recommendations for Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Data Assessment in Specific Patient Populations

Marco Guazzi, Ross Arena, Martin Halle, Massimo Piepoli et al.

Short summary

A 2016 focused update revises and expands clinical recommendations for cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) data assessment, introducing new algorithms and clarifying existing ones based on recent research.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Revises and expands clinical recommendations for CPX data assessment.
  • Introduces new algorithms and clarifies existing ones based on recent research.
  • Addresses oxygen consumption at ventilatory threshold and emerging CPX variables.
  • Discusses synergistic value of combining CPX with other assessments.
  • Provides recommendations for CPX laboratory personnel and future research.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

In the past several decades, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) has seen an exponential increase in its evidence base. The growing volume of evidence in support of CPX has precipitated the release of numerous scientific statements by societies and associations. In 2012, the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation and the American Heart Association developed a joint document with the primary intent of redefining CPX analysis and reporting in a way that would streamline test interpretation and increase clinical application. Specifically, the 2012 joint scientific statement on CPX conceptualized an easy-to-use, clinically meaningful analysis based on evidence-vetted variables in color-coded algorithms; single-page algorithms were successfully developed for each proposed test indication. Because of an abundance of new CPX research in recent years and a reassessment of the current algorithms in light of the body of evidence, a focused update to the 2012 scientific statement is now warranted. The purposes of this update are to confirm algorithms included in the initial scientific statement not requiring revision, to propose revisions to algorithms included in the initial scientific statement, to propose new algorithms based on emerging scientific evidence, to further clarify the application of oxygen consumption at ventilatory threshold, to describe CPX variables with an emerging scientific evidence base, to describe the synergistic value of combining CPX with other assessments, to discuss personnel considerations for CPX laboratories, and to provide recommendations for future CPX research.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Circulation, 2016 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Complementary and alternative medicine

Complementary and alternative medicineMedicine