Sci· 2026Q1
Diagnostic Performance of Source-Recorded Food-Specific Prick-by-Prick Testing Against Oral Food Challenge Outcomes: A Challenge-Selected Single-Center Retrospective Study
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Food-specific prick-by-prick (PbP) testing showed 85.7% sensitivity and 84.3% specificity against oral food challenges (OFCs) in a low-prevalence cohort, with a high negative predictive value of 98.9%.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Food-specific prick-by-prick (PbP) testing had 85.7% sensitivity and 84.3% specificity versus oral food challenges (OFCs).
- The negative predictive value of PbP was high at 98.9%.
- PbP positivity was strongly associated with OFC positivity (OR 32.21, p=0.0022).
- The study included 115 evaluations from 76 patients, with only 7 OFCs (6.1%) being positive.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Oral food challenge (OFC) is the reference standard for diagnosing IgE-mediated food allergy, whereas the performance of prick-by-prick testing (PbP) with native foods in routine care is uncertain. We retrospectively screened all food-specific OFC records from 2 January 2024 to 6 December 2025 and included evaluations with a source-recorded same-food PbP result and an OFC classified by the attending allergist. Confidence intervals were estimated by patient-cluster bootstrap; a clustered logistic generalized estimating equation assessed the PbP–OFC association. Among 115 evaluations from 76 patients, 7 OFCs (6.1%) were positive. The matrix comprised 6 true positives, 17 false positives, 1 false negative, and 91 true negatives. Sensitivity was 85.7% (95% CI, 50.0–100.0), specificity 84.3% (73.6–93.4), positive predictive value 26.1% (8.3–52.9), and negative predictive value 98.9% (96.4–100.0). PbP positivity was associated with OFC positivity (odds ratio, 32.21; 95% CI, 3.48–297.97; p = 0.0022). Because only seven OFCs were positive, sensitivity and the GEE association estimate were imprecise. Negative PbP results were usually followed by negative OFCs in this challenge-selected, low-prevalence cohort; however, one of seven positive OFCs followed a negative PbP, and the open, non-blinded design permits diagnostic review bias. These hypothesis-generating findings do not support replacing OFC with PbP alone.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Sci, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Immunology and Allergy
Immunology and AllergyMedicine