Instructional Science· 2015Q1
Collaborative design as a form of professional development
- 316citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2015year
Short summary
Collaborative curriculum design can serve as professional development for teachers, supported by situatedness, agency, and cyclical learning, as demonstrated in three case studies.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Collaborative curriculum design is proposed as a form of teacher professional development.
- The theoretical frameworks of activity theory and Greeno's situative perspective are applied.
- Key features examined include situatedness, agency, and the cyclical nature of learning and change.
- Three case studies across different settings illustrate these concepts.
- An agenda for future research on teacher learning by design is presented.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Increasingly, teacher involvement in collaborative design of curriculum is viewed as a form of professional development. However, the research base for this stance is limited. While it is assumed that the activities teachers undertake during collaborative design of curricular materials can be beneficial for teacher learning, only a few studies involving such efforts exist. Additionally many lack specific theoretical frameworks for robust investigation of teacher learning by design. The situative perspective articulated by Greeno et al. ( 1998 ) and third-generation activity theory as developed by Engeström ( 1987 ) constitute useful conceptual frameworks to describe and investigate teacher learning by collaborative design. In this contribution, three key features derived from these two theories, situatedness , agency and the cyclical nature of learning and change , are used to describe three cases of collaborative design in three different settings. Grounded on this theoretical basis and a synthesis of the three case descriptions, we propose an empirically and theoretically informed agenda for studying teacher learning by collaborative design.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Instructional Science, 2015 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Human Factors and Ergonomics
Human Factors and ErgonomicsSocial Sciences