Journal of the Learning Sciences· 2016Q1
Multilevel Boundary Crossing in a Professional Development School Partnership
- 227citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2016year
Short summary
A multilevel boundary crossing approach reveals that while coordination occurred across institutional, interpersonal, and intrapersonal levels in a Professional Development School (PDS) partnership's startup years, transformation primarily happened at the intrapersonal level in later years.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- PDS partnerships involve crossing institutional and epistemological boundaries between teacher education, schooling, and research.
- A multilevel boundary crossing approach was used to analyze a PDS partnership's startup.
- Coordination occurred at institutional, interpersonal, and intrapersonal levels initially.
- Transformation occurred mainly at the intrapersonal level in later years.
- Brokers played a significant role but sometimes limited others' involvement.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This study aims to understand the recurrent challenges of professional development school (PDS) partnerships experienced by many countries. It does so by conceptualizing PDS partnerships as endeavors to cross institutionally and epistemologically developed boundaries between teacher education, schooling, and academic research. After introducing what we call a multilevel boundary crossing approach, we look at the startup years of one academic PDS partnership, scrutinizing the successive learning mechanisms that were evoked at the institutional, interpersonal, and intrapersonal levels. The case study narrative illustrates the multilevel nature of boundary crossing and reveals different learning mechanisms in different phases and at different levels. For example, whereas coordination initially occurred at all levels, transformation occurred in later years mainly at the intrapersonal level. The study sheds specific light on the intrapersonal level by showing the significant and challenging role of various brokers in establishing both horizontal and vertical connections across and within the organizations involved. Despite being important leaders of the partnerships’ activities, we observed how brokers prevented others from becoming more involved. We propose that partnerships should carefully consider the sort of learning processes they aspire to and can realistically expect at different levels and moments in time and accordingly consider how they want to position the various actors.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2016 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Human Factors and Ergonomics
Human Factors and ErgonomicsSocial Sciences