Tourism and Hospitality· 2026Q2
Accessible Tourism After the European Accessibility Act: Signalling in Hotels and Private Accommodation Across Four European Union Countries
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Hotels advertise significantly more accessibility features (mean index 1.58) than private accommodation (0.38) across four EU countries, despite the European Accessibility Act's mandate for e-commerce accessibility.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Hotels advertise 1.58 accessibility features on average, compared to 0.38 for private accommodation across four EU countries.
- Providers in countries with more mature accessible tourism policies advertise more accessibility features (mean index 1.25 vs. 0.70).
- Only 3.0% of properties advertise sensory accessibility features, versus 37.0% advertising mobility features.
- One out of twenty-seven audited websites displayed accessibility information on provider listing cards.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) has applied, since June 2025, extending binding accessibility requirements to the e-commerce infrastructure through which tourism is sold. Whether that obligation is visible in tourism markets remains largely untested, and existing evidence covers hotels alone. Accessibility is examined across three layers in four member states differing in the operational maturity of their accessible tourism policies: Croatia, France, Greece and Portugal. The study documents national programmes and transposition, audits thirty-two tourist board websites and records the features advertised by 400 providers, half hotels and half private accommodation, across twenty cities matched by destination type. Providers in countries with operationally mature programmes advertise more (mean index 1.25 against 0.70 on a 0–10 scale), though with four countries, this compares cases rather than testing a policy effect. The gap between accommodation segments is larger and is measured within cities: private accommodation advertises 0.38 against 1.58 for hotels, in every country and in eighteen of the twenty cities (p < 0.001). Sensory features are advertised by 3.0% of properties against 37.0% for mobility, and one of the twenty-seven audited websites with an assessable listing interface displays accessibility on provider listing cards. The pattern is consistent with obligation setting a floor and visibility governing what rises above it, which one cross-section cannot establish.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Tourism and Hospitality, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Human Factors and Ergonomics
Human Factors and ErgonomicsSocial Sciences