PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Discover Education· 2026Q2

Accessibility of e-learning platforms for lecturers and students with visual impairments in Tanzania’s university systems

Simon Ngalomba

Short summary

E-learning exclusion for visually impaired lecturers and students in Tanzania is a systemic issue, stemming from inaccessible practices, fragmented support, inflexible policies, and societal stigma across multiple ecological levels.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • E-learning platforms in Tanzania present significant accessibility barriers for lecturers and students with visual impairments.
  • Barriers operate across multiple ecological systems, including microsystem (inaccessible practices/resources), mesosystem (fragmented support), exosystem (inflexible policies), macrosystem (stigma), and chronosystem (delayed access).
  • The study used a qualitative single-case design with 16 participants (12 students, 4 staff) with visual impairments.
  • Findings indicate e-learning exclusion is a systemic problem, not an individual one, requiring integrated institutional reforms.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The rapid expansion of e-learning in higher education has increased opportunities for flexible teaching and learning; however, lecturers and students with visual impairments (SVIs) continue to experience significant barriers to accessing digital learning environments in Tanzania. Despite national commitments to inclusive education, little is known about how barriers to e-learning accessibility operate across different ecological contexts. Guided by Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory, this study explored the accessibility of e-learning platforms for lecturers and students with visual impairments at the Open University of Tanzania. A qualitative single-case study design was employed, involving 12 undergraduate students and 4 academic staff members with visual impairments, purposively selected across 4 faculties. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis, supported by MAXQDA software. Five interconnected themes emerged corresponding to Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems. Inaccessible teaching practices and learning resources within the microsystem; fragmented collaboration in Disability and ICT support within the mesosystem; inflexible institutional assessment policies and governance within the exosystem; disability stigma and limited disclosure within the macrosystem; and cumulative educational disadvantage resulting from delayed access to accessible learning resources within the chronosystem. The findings demonstrate that e-learning exclusion is a systemic rather than an individual problem, produced through interactions across multiple ecological levels. The study concludes that improving digital inclusion requires coordinated institutional reforms that integrate Universal Design for Learning principles, strengthen cross-unit collaboration, promote inclusive institutional cultures and embed accessibility within digital infrastructure, teaching practices and assessment policies to ensure equitable participation for students with visual impairments.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Discover Education, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Human Factors and Ergonomics

Human Factors and ErgonomicsSocial Sciences