The paradox of neglecting changes in behavior: How standard epidemic models misestimate both transmissibility and final epidemic size

Short summary

Epidemic models that ignore behavioral changes consistently underestimate transmissibility (R0) while overestimating final epidemic size, leading to flawed public health policy. Models incorporating mortality-driven transmission reduction fit COVID-19 data better across 30 US locations and analytically proved this dual bias.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.