PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Obesity Reviews· 2015Q1

The effects of high‐intensity interval training on glucose regulation and insulin resistance: a meta‐analysis

Charlotte Jelleyman, Thomas Yates, Gary O’Donovan, Laura J. Gray et al.

Short summary

A meta-analysis of 50 studies shows high-intensity interval training (HIIT) significantly reduces insulin resistance compared to both control conditions (SMD = -0.49) and continuous training (SMD = -0.35), and lowers HbA1c by 0.19%.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • HIIT reduces insulin resistance vs. control (SMD = -0.49, P = 0.009) and continuous training (SMD = -0.35, P = 0.036).
  • HIIT decreases HbA1c by 0.19% (P = 0.021) and body weight by 1.3 kg (P < 0.001) compared to controls.
  • Participants with or at risk of type 2 diabetes experienced a significant reduction in fasting glucose (-0.92 mmol/L, P < 0.001) vs. controls.
  • Overall, HIIT appears effective for improving metabolic health, especially in individuals with or at risk of type 2 diabetes.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis was to quantify the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on markers of glucose regulation and insulin resistance compared with control conditions (CON) or continuous training (CT). Databases were searched for HIIT interventions based upon the inclusion criteria: training ≥2 weeks, adult participants and outcome measurements that included insulin resistance, fasting glucose, HbA1c or fasting insulin. Dual interventions and participants with type 1 diabetes were excluded. Fifty studies were included. There was a reduction in insulin resistance following HIIT compared with both CON and CT (HIIT vs. CON: standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.49, confidence intervals [CIs] -0.87 to -0.12, P = 0.009; CT: SMD = -0.35, -0.68 to -0.02, P = 0.036). Compared with CON, HbA1c decreased by 0.19% (-0.36 to -0.03, P = 0.021) and body weight decreased by 1.3 kg (-1.9 to -0.7, P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in other outcomes overall. However, participants at risk of or with type 2 diabetes experienced reductions in fasting glucose (-0.92 mmol L(-1), -1.22 to -0.62, P < 0.001) compared with CON. HIIT appears effective at improving metabolic health, particularly in those at risk of or with type 2 diabetes. Larger randomized controlled trials of longer duration than those included in this meta-analysis are required to confirm these results.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Obesity Reviews, 2015 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Complementary and alternative medicine

Complementary and alternative medicineMedicine