Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy· 2026Q2
Decolonial Entrepreneurship Education: Innovative Pedagogies and Contradictions From a Latin American Case Study
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A decolonial entrepreneurship course in the Galápagos Islands reframed entrepreneurial skills as situated, relational, and embodied performances, fostering cultural humility and ethical reflexivity.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Decolonial entrepreneurship education (EE) in Latin America challenges Global North models by integrating local cosmovisions.
- The 'Idea to Start-up: Climate Action' course in the Galápagos Islands used Sumak Kawsay as its ethical compass.
- Pedagogical mechanisms included immersion, co-creation, embodied practices, and role fluidity.
- The course fostered cultural humility, ethical reflexivity, and contextual opportunity recognition.
- Contradictions arose from academic calendars, language, genre conventions, and growth-oriented imaginaries.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Entrepreneurship education (EE) in Latin America is largely delivered through Global North pedagogical models that privilege individual agency and abstract venture logics, with limited fit for other region’s cultural and socio-ecological complexity. This study asks how decolonial pedagogical commitments are built into the design and enactment of a community-engaged entrepreneurship course, and what epistemic, institutional, and material contradictions emerge when these commitments are enacted in practice. Drawing on a qualitative case study of the Idea to Start-up: Climate Action course at TU Delft, implemented with community partners in Ecuador’s Galápagos Islands, the analysis triangulates course materials, student reflections, instructor observations, student deliverables, and community feedback. The Andean cosmovision Sumak Kawsay served as the normative and ethical compass of the course design, enacted through three pedagogical mechanisms: immersion and co-creation, embodied and reflective practices, and role fluidity with a partial redistribution of pedagogical authority. These mechanisms reframed entrepreneurial competences as situated, relational, and embodied performances, fostering emerging manifestations of cultural humility, ethical reflexivity, and contextual opportunity recognition, while academic calendars, language and genre conventions, and growth-oriented imaginaries kept the translation partial and contested. The paper contributes an account of decolonial EE as an imperfect, situated practice of pedagogical translation.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 2026 · DOI ↗
The rest is in the Pofolia app
Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.
Sign in on the web to openField: Human Factors and Ergonomics
Human Factors and ErgonomicsSocial Sciences