PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Vocations and Learning· 2026Q2

Beyond Enabling Perspectives: How Organizational Conditions Shape Intertwined Forms of Professional Agency in Health and Social Care

Jenni Rikala, Minna Ylönen, Panu Forsman, Petri Kulmala et al.

Short summary

Organizational conditions, specifically managerial practices, developmental resources, and interprofessional collaboration, shape professional agency in health and social care settings, influencing its forms from proactive to constrained.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Managerial/leadership practices, developmental conditions, and interprofessional collaboration are key organizational shapers of professional agency.
  • Professional agency manifests in diverse forms, including proactive, collective, constrained, and compensatory.
  • Reflective work (reflection and reflexivity) is crucial for professionals to navigate organizational demands and make sense of their work.
  • Agency is expressed not only through development but also through adaptation and improvisation in response to constraints.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract The need to deepen our understanding of how organizational conditions shape the enactment of professional agency in the context of rapidly changing health and social care organizations is growing. Professional agency is understood in this study as a temporally embedded, relational, and situated process through which professionals shape their work and work‑related identities while individually and collectively interacting with the sociocultural conditions of their practice, including in interprofessional collaboration. Specifically, the present study examined how professional agency is enacted in two Finnish settings—adolescent psychiatry and adolescent residential care—using semi‑structured interviews with 14 professionals to explore how organizational conditions shape agency in complex care environments. The interview transcripts were abductively analyzed, revealing three interrelated dimensions that influence the enactment of professional agency: managerial and leadership practices (i.e., how leaders act and communicate), structural and professional developmental conditions (i.e., resources and processes, such as training), and organizational climate and interprofessional collaboration (i.e., relational conditions, including trust). These organizational conditions individually and jointly shape the forms that professional agency takes, ranging from proactive and collective to constrained and compensatory. The findings also highlight reflective work, encompassing both reflection and reflexivity, as a cross-cutting process through which professionals navigate tensions and make sense of organizational demands. Importantly, agency was expressed not only through participation and development-oriented action but also through professionals’ active negotiation, adaptation, and improvisation in response to organizational constraints. These insights deepen our understanding of professional agency by extending conceptualizations of agency beyond enabling organizational conditions and positive expressions.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Vocations and Learning, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementBusiness, Management and Accounting