PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Education Sciences· 2026Q1

Playing Under Pressure: Lived Meanings, Tensions, and Re-Significations in Teachers’ Ludic Mediation Through Play and Toys

Frank Guerra-Reyes, Eric Guerra-Dávila, Edison Díaz-Martínez

Short summary

Teachers in resource-limited Ecuadorian schools creatively use play and toys despite institutional pressures, re-signifying material scarcity as a source of invention and integrating play as a core, albeit challenging, pedagogical practice.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Teachers in resource-limited settings integrate play and toys despite significant curricular, evaluative, and institutional tensions.
  • Material scarcity is narrated by participants as a catalyst for invention and creative use of play resources.
  • Pressure is experienced as constitutive of, rather than external to, school-based play practices.
  • The study identified five key meanings: embodied ludic heritage, material scarcity as invention, playing under pressure, transformation of the didactic gaze, and the teacher’s symbolic horizon.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Play and toys are central resources for learning; however, their integration into schooling is typically traversed by curricular, evaluative, disciplinary, and institutional tensions, particularly in resource-limited contexts. This study examined the meanings, tensions, and re-significations that shape the lived experience of in-service teachers, pre-service teacher education students, and university teacher educators when mediating instruction with play and toys. A phenomenological–hermeneutic study was conducted in Imbabura, Ecuador, with 61 participants: 27 undergraduate education students, 26 school teachers, and 8 university faculty members. In-depth phenomenological interviews were administered, and the corpus was organized and analyzed using Atlas.ti to support the interpretive traceability of the process. The phenomenological–hermeneutic interpretation yielded five nuclei of meaning: embodied ludic heritage, material scarcity narrated as a source of invention, playing under pressure as a structural condition of the classroom as lived by participants, transformation of the didactic gaze, and the teacher’s symbolic horizon. Within this corpus, pressure emerges not as external to play but as a condition participants describe as constitutive of its school-based practice. The study concludes that, in the situated experience analyzed here, ludic mediation appears as a practice that demands professional judgment, contextual sensitivity, and institutional recognition.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Education Sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Human Factors and Ergonomics

Human Factors and ErgonomicsSocial Sciences