PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Social Networks· 2026Q1

The relational structure of corporate ignorance production

Gabriel Lévesque

Short summary

Corporate actors proactively engage scientific organizations more than regulatory ones, anticipating and influencing environmental regulations, according to an analysis of lead industry documents (1924-2003).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Corporate engagement with scientific organizations is more intensive than with other types of organizations.
  • Corporate engagement with regulatory expert organizations is less intensive.
  • Corporate engagement with scientists increases with federal interest and anticipates regulatory changes.
  • This pattern suggests corporate engagement with scientists is both reactive and preemptive.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This study interrogates patterns of interaction through which corporate actors influence environmental knowledge production. I ask 1) How intensive are relationships between corporate actors and knowledge-producing organizations? 2) What types of knowledge-producing organizations are subject to most engagement by corporate actors? and 3) How do these patterns evolve over time? I answer these questions with the landmark case of lead in the United States (1924–2003). I rely on longitudinal network data built from the raw text of Toxic Docs, a database that comprises millions of previously classified corporate documents over eight decades. Using relational event modeling, I find that corporate engagement with scientific organizations is consistently more likely than with other types of actors. In contrast, corporate engagement with regulatory expert organizations is less so. I also find that corporate engagement with scientific organizations is responsive to growing federal interest in the lead problem and anticipates regulatory developments. This suggests that corporate engagement with scientists is best described not simply as reactive but also as preemptive.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Social Networks, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementBusiness, Management and Accounting